2021 Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right to health
Analysis of precedential value
The special rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health is a human rights expert mandated to report and advise on this human right. This mandate was created by the Commission on Human Rights in April 2002 and has been periodically renewed since. This report constitutes an authoritative source of expert precedent for the meaning and significance of key language. The incumbent at the time of this report’s release was Dr Tlaleng Mofokeng (South Africa).
The report, it notes, “is based on discussions held by the Special Rapporteur with right holders, civil society and other relevant stakeholders, including Member States, since the beginning of her mandate in August 2020; information continuously received on sexual and reproductive health rights, including on alleged violations of these rights; and communications sent to Member States and businesses in this regard.”
Used as precedent
human rights
“The Special Rapporteur views the practice of medicine as in itself a tool for the promotion of human rights and thus health-care workers are key to changing the patriarchal and paternalistic systems of medical practice.” (paragraph 80)
“The Special Rapporteur recommends that States respect and protect key principles of non-discrimination, equality and privacy, as well as the integrity, autonomy, dignity and well-being of individuals, especially in relation to sexual and reproductive health rights.” (paragraph 90)
gender equality
“The Special Rapporteur observes a global patriarchal culture, a regressive climate and pushback in the area of sexual and reproductive health rights and opposition to gender equality. Gains made in the past decades in these areas are at risk of being rolled back, with the rights and perspectives of women, girls and LGBTIQ+ persons sidelined.” (paragraph 82)
access to health products, stigma and discrimination
“The Special Rapporteur recommends that biomedical artificial intelligence (AI) technologies must not perpetuate racism, sexism, ableism or discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender. States must eliminate social and political inequalities in order to bridge the gendered digital divide, taking into account the needs of people with disabilities, which includes offering protections from discrimination and violence related to utilization of digital tools and technology.” (paragraph 87)